Henry v. McCormack Bros. Motor Car Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The petition is for mandamus to compel the issue of a dealer’s license under the provisions of the General Revenue Act of 1935, General Acts 1935, p. 445, § 348, Schedule 12; p. 557, § 350.
The major questions presented for decision are: What was the expressed legislative intent by the several provisions of the statute considered in pari materia; and if the proviso in section 348, Schedule 12, governs,.is it offensive to section 221 of the Constitution?
There are recognized canons of statutory construction that will be observed. In construing statutes, they are: (1) “Where the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Jefferson County v. BusbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Prowell v. State ex rel. HastySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Armstrong v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Ex Parte RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- National Linen Service Corp. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- State v. Helburn Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Minnifield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.