Legal Opinion

White v. Stevenson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1904No. L.A. No. 1245PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, C.

December 30, 1890, the defendants, Frank Stevenson and Charles B. Stevenson, his brother, executed to the plaintiff their promissory note, together, with a mortgage to secure its payment upon certain lands in the county of Los Angeles. The note and mortgage were given for the purpose of taking up a previous note and mortgage given by them to Josefa A. de Miller, which had been assigned to the plaintiff, and were executed by Frank individually and as the attorney for Charles under a special power of attorney, by which Charles had authorized Frank to make in his name and execute to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Bruse v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. Sterling v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Easton v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Feig v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API