Legal Opinion
In Re George & John Hurt
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 23, 1955No. 7714PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, Chief Judge.
On July 21, 1953, George E. and John H. Hurt, a copartnership (to be referred to as “the debtors”), filed a petition for an arrangement under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act. 1 The schedules accompanying the petition listed the chattel mortgage here involved.
On July 23, 1953, the Court approved the petition. Thereafter, on August 10, 1953, the debtor in possession, John Harvey Hurt, filed before the Referee a petition for - an Order to Show Cause why certain alleged secured creditors of the debtors should not be hereafter scheduled and treated as unsecured creditors.…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Carey v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- In Re Kansas City Journal-Post Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Gage v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- County of Alameda v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Kelly v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Loup v. Great Plains Western Ranch Co. (In Re Great Plains Western Ranch Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1984
- Provident Bank v. BBT (In Re BBT)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1981
- Block v. LeaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
- Clements v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- William v. Martin, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Aerocolor, Inc., Dba Aero Press Co., a Corporation v. Crocker-Citizens National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.