Selected Risks Insurance v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
This is an appeal from the Judgment resulting from the entry of the trial court Order denying Appellant’s petition to Modify, Correct, or Vacate an Award of Arbitrators, and granting Appellee’s petition to Confirm the Arbitration Award.
By its brief, Appellant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to apply the “contrary to law” standard of review set forth in § 7302(d)(2) of the Uniform Arbitration Act (the Act), 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 7301, et seq. Section 7302(d)(2) provides that, under limited circumstances, an award may be modified or corrected where the award is contrary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Boris v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- De Villars Et Vir v. HesslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Miller v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Zern Et Ux. v. MuldoonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Selected Risks Insurance Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Geisler v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Popskyj v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Browne v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Bowdren v. Aetna Life & CasualtySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.