Legal Opinion

De Villars Et Vir v. Hessler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1949No. Appeal, 135PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

In this case plaintiffs filed a complaint, defendants an answer together with new matter, and plaintiffs a reply to the new matter. The court sustained a motion by defendants for judgment on the pleadings, the question involved being the right of a member of an unincorporated association to recover from it for injuries sustained through a tort committed by other members in carrying out an association project.

Accepting as true all the allegations contained in plaintiff’s complaint and their reply to new matter, it appears that Kiser Hill-Mead Grange is an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HetrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Paperry v. RybackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Koogler v. KooglerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hromek v. Freie GemeindeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Roschmann v. SanbornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Boehm v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. McRoberts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Selected Risks Insurance Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Lorch v. EglinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Marshall v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API