Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. Waverly Mills

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 16, 1982No. 8110IC781PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

In their first and third assignments of error, defendants contend that the Commission erred in finding that plaintiff is permanently and totally disabled as a result of chronic obstructive lung disease which, plaintiff contracted as a result of his exposure to cotton dust during his employment as a textile worker. Defendants’ argument takes two tacks: one, that the evidence does not support a finding of total disability; and two, that the evidence does not support a finding that plaintiffs disability was caused solely by his exposure to cotton dust in his employment. The standard…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chaisson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Moore v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Kee v. CAROMONT HEALTH, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Williams v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. Allen v. Standard Mineral Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API