Legal Opinion

Grable v. Varela

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 7, 1977No. 2 CA-CIV 2269PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

The issue in this case is whether the “fireman’s rule” should be accepted in Arizona.

Randall Grable, a member of the Tucson Fire Department, was injured while fighting a fire at an unoccupied residence located in Tucson, Arizona. The fire was started by the appellee, Joseph Richard Varela, a minor, who, while playing with matches, started a grass fire which spread to the house.

The complaint filed by appellants was based on negligence. After initial discovery, appellees moved for summary judgment. Appellants resisted the motion and moved to amend their complaint to allege…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Hass v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Solgaard v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Giorgi v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co. v. O'LearyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Pottebaum v. HindsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Flowers v. Rock Creek Terrace Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Mahoney v. Carus Chemical Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Garcia v. City of South TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API