Strut v. Huselton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 96, Oct. T., 1921, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., April T., 1920, No. 617, on bill in equity, in case of Jacob Shrut v. M. Láveme Huselton and S. H. Huselton, her husband, and Harry Gillman and Rebecca Gillman, his wife. Bill in equity for specific performance. Before Drew, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Decree for specific performance. Defendants appealed. Error assigned, inter alia, was decree, quoting it.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,
Plaintiff, Jacob Shrut, sued in equity to enforce specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate, which he had purchased from M. Láveme Huselton, the wife of S. H. Huselton, and which they, instead of conveying to him, had deeded to Harry Gillman; all of whom, with Rebecca Gillman, the wife of the last mentioned, are defendants. After a hearing on bill, answer and proofs, a decree was entered in favor of plaintiff, and defendants have appealed.
The chancellor found: that, on November 17,1919, the first named defendant agreed in writing to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tripp v. BishopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
3Cited by13 opinions
- Detwiler v. CaponeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Bogojavlensky v. LoganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Sidle v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Driebe v. Fort Penn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Erkess v. EisenthalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.