Legal Opinion

Tripp v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1868PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Venango county : No. 83, to October and November Term 1867. In the court below William E. Bishop commenced an action of assumpsit to November Term 1865, against Isaac Tripp, Isaac Decker and Samuel Stevenson. There was no appearance for Decker.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Venango county : No. 83, to October and November Term 1867. In the court below William E. Bishop commenced an action of assumpsit to November Term 1865, against Isaac Tripp, Isaac Decker and Samuel Stevenson. There was no appearance for Decker. The plaintiff declared in three counts. 1. That the defendants were indebted to him in $.13,000 “for a certain messuage, &c., bargained and released by him’.’ to them, and being so indebted promised to pay, &c. 2. That they were indebted, &c., “for one undivided half of a certain messuage,” &c., and being so…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered, January 7th 1868, by

Strong, J.

It is only because of the Statute of Frauds that a parol contract for the purchase and sale of lands cannot be enforced according to the words of the contract. Unlike the British statute, ours does not absolutely avoid the agreement. It simply restrains its effect. The British statute declares that “ no action shall be brought whereby to charge any person upon any contract or sale of lands, tenements or hereditaments, or any interest in or concerning them, unless the agreement upon which. such action shall be brought, or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  2. Lowry v. MehaffySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Ottman v. Nixon-NirdlingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Ruth v. CraneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Landon v. MoreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Trachtenburg v. Sibarco Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API