Legal Opinion
Miner v. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided November 20, 1992No. 66,959, 67,651PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wahl, J.:
This decision considers the consolidated appeals filed by Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. (Farm Bureau). In Case No. 66,959, the appeal is from numerous alleged trial errors and the jury’s verdict finding Farm Bureau liable for additional personal injury protection (PIP) benefits in the form of additional wage loss benefits, substitution benefits, and rehabilitation benefits. In Case No. 67,651, the appeal is from the trial court’s judgment granting interest on the judgment, future medical benefits, and attorney fees and expenses to Cathy R. Miner.
On or about August 6,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Martindale v. TennySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Boatright v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Memorial Hospital Ass'n, Inc. v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Stayton v. StaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Liggatt v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- City of Salina, Kan. v. Maryland Cas. Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Jones v. Reliable Security Incorporation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Gerdes v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Hephner v. Traders InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.