Donato v. American Locomotive Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentBergan, J.
In modifying the order of the Special Term dismissing the original complaint - in this action we affirmed the dismissal but permitted the plaintiff to replead (279 App. Div. 545). In deference to our views the court at Special Term has denied a motion to dismiss the present complaint which is in substantial compliance with the further pleading permissible under our decision,
*419The new complaint pleads in effect the joint action of the defendants in so delaying submission of a proceeding in arbitration which they controlled that plaintiff’s right to adjudication was frustrated and prevented.
There…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Estro Chemical Co. v. FalkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Hudak v. Hornell Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Raven Electric Co. v. LinzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Donato v. American Locomotive Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.