Donato v. American Locomotive Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBebgan, J.
This is a badly drawn complaint, but in the interstices of its language plaintiff seems to suggest that he may be entitled to an equitable intervention in support of his purported rights. If he shows this much, he should be allowed to plead over even though we conclude, which we do, that the Special Term was right in its order of dismissal.
The action is brought against plaintiff’s employer, the American Locomotive Company, and his labor union, United Steelworkers of America, C. I. 0., Local Union No. 2054, and arises out of the arbitration of the causes for the plaintiff’s discharge from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Bullard & Morgan H. Grace Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Perkins v. . GilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- In re AlbertNew York Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- Donato v. American Locomotive Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Central School District No. 1 v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- In re the Arbitration between Messina & Briante Inc. & Blitman Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Donato v. American Locomotive Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954