Legal Opinion

Raven Electric Co. v. Linzer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1951PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

Protracted litigation between the plaintiff as a tenant and the defendants as landlords has given rise to this action.

The rent to be paid by the plaintiff-tenant to the defendants-landlords for the use of commercial space at 889 Broadway, Manhattan Borough, New York City, was fixed in 1948 by an arbitration proceeding at a sum in excess of rent otherwise permissible under the emergency rent control laws. By the action now before us the plaintiff-tenant seeks a judgment declaring that the arbitration proceeding was a mere sham; that the order made at Special Term confirming the arbitration…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Heidelberger & CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estro Chemical Co. v. FalkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Donato v. American Locomotive Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Textile Workers Union v. Uncas Printing & Finishing Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1956
  4. Feinberg v. Barry Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. In re the Arbitration between Katz & BurkinNew York Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API