Raven Electric Co. v. Linzer
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Protracted litigation between the plaintiff as a tenant and the defendants as landlords has given rise to this action.
The rent to be paid by the plaintiff-tenant to the defendants-landlords for the use of commercial space at 889 Broadway, Manhattan Borough, New York City, was fixed in 1948 by an arbitration proceeding at a sum in excess of rent otherwise permissible under the emergency rent control laws. By the action now before us the plaintiff-tenant seeks a judgment declaring that the arbitration proceeding was a mere sham; that the order made at Special Term confirming the arbitration…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- In Re the Arbitration Between Heidelberger & CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
3Cited by12 opinions
- Estro Chemical Co. v. FalkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Donato v. American Locomotive Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Textile Workers Union v. Uncas Printing & Finishing Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1956
- Feinberg v. Barry Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
- In re the Arbitration between Katz & BurkinNew York Supreme Court · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.