Legal Opinion
Estro Chemical Co. v. Falk
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 1951PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff tenant, in its first cause of action, to recover from the landlord rent paid in excess of the emergency rent permissible under the applicable provisions of the Commercial (Emergency) Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 3, as amd.). That excess rent, it is alleged in the complaint, was paid under a rental agreement between plaintiff and defendant which continued up to February, 1949.
In contemplation of termination of the agreement just mentioned, negotiations were commenced in February, 1949, looking toward a new one. On the 21st day of February, the two parties…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Twentieth Century Associates, Inc. v. WaldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- American Reserve Insurance v. China InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Adler v. . Weis Fisher Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Abramovich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Nishman v. De MarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Drucker v. MauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Millington v. RapoportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Board of Education v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.