Legal Opinion
Hudak v. Hornell Industries, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 1952PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
Plaintiffs in these companion actions, suing as third-party beneficiaries, seek damages for alleged breach of a contract made between defendant employer and the Machine Printers Beneficial Association, the union to which plaintiffs belonged since 1933. They had been employed by defendant since June, 1940, Hudak as foreman textile printer and Stika as journeyman printer. The union and defendant had entered into contracts annually since 1940. Their latest agreement, the one in controversy, was entered into on August 4, 1948, and provided, among other things, as follows:
“ Section 1. Salary and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- People v. Globe Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Assets Realization Co. v. . RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Gulla v. BartonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- 407 East 61st Garage, Inc. v. Savoy Fifth Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Parker v. BorockNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Jones v. International Union of Operating EngineersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Wilson Sullivan Co. v. International Paper Makers Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Donato v. American Locomotive Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.