Legal Opinion

United States v. Blackshire

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 14, 1991No. ACM 28780PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KASTL, Senior Judge:

In January 1987, Sergeant Blackshire was living off-base in Okinawa with his wife and child. He received an Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA) to help cover living expenses. By April 1987, friction developed in the family. Mrs. Blackshire elected to return to the United States with her baby, and the sergeant moved back on base. At this juncture, he was no longer entitled to the OHA. In May 1987, the couple divorced.

The guilty plea inquiry and a stipulation of fact indicate that Sergeant Blackshire advised Accounting and Finance officials soon thereafter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. RoarkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. WatkinsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. CastilloU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. AntonelliUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. DeanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. ViveritoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. MeeksU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. HarrisonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API