Legal Opinion

Shoshone Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. Dolinski

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1966No. 5112PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Thompson, J.:

The important question presented by this appeal is whether Nevada should judicially adopt the doctrine of strict tort liability against a manufacturer and distributor of a bottled beverage. Subordinate questions are also involved and will be discussed.

1. Leo Dolinski suffered physical and mental distress when he partially consumed the contents of a bottle of “Squirt” containing a decomposed mouse-. As a consequence he filed this action for damages against Shoshone Coca-Cola Bottling Company, the manufacturer and distributor of “Squirt.” His complaint alleged…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Miller v. SchnitzerNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Groat v. Walkup Drayage & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Darryl v. Ford Motor CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Maduike v. Agency Rent-A-CarNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Allstate Insurance Company and Granite Mutual Insurance Company v. Hamilton Beach/proctor Silex, Inc., Docket No. 04-6282-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API