Shoshone Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. Dolinski
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court, Thompson, J.:
The important question presented by this appeal is whether Nevada should judicially adopt the doctrine of strict tort liability against a manufacturer and distributor of a bottled beverage. Subordinate questions are also involved and will be discussed.
1. Leo Dolinski suffered physical and mental distress when he partially consumed the contents of a bottle of “Squirt” containing a decomposed mouse-. As a consequence he filed this action for damages against Shoshone Coca-Cola Bottling Company, the manufacturer and distributor of “Squirt.” His complaint alleged…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Miller v. SchnitzerNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Groat v. Walkup Drayage & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Darryl v. Ford Motor CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Maduike v. Agency Rent-A-CarNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Allstate Insurance Company and Granite Mutual Insurance Company v. Hamilton Beach/proctor Silex, Inc., Docket No. 04-6282-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.