Legal Opinion
Darryl v. Ford Motor Company
Texas Supreme Court
Decided April 23, 1969No. B-1172PublishedCited by 197 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGEE, Justice.
This is a suit for damages arising out of a rear-end collision filed by Petitioners Harold Darryl and wife, Anita Darryl, against Defendant John D. Voyles, alleging various counts of negligence, and against Respondent Ford Motor Company for negligence in equipping Voyles’ truck with defective brakes, and in the alternative, strict liability in tort. The trial court entered judgment upon the verdict in favor of petitioners against Ford but denied recovery against Voyles and also denied recovery by Ford against Voyles for contribution or indemnity. Both Darryl and Ford failed to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Wagner v. FosterTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Moises Galindo v. Precision American Corp., Georgia Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Rourke v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1975
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.