Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Glaese

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1995No. 49S02-9512-CV-1379PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petition To Transfer

DICKSON, Justice.

We are asked to determine whether a physician's conduct constituted active fraudulent concealment so as to estop the physician from asserting the medical malpractice statute of limitations. In this interlocutory appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's denial of the defendant physician's motion for summary judgment. Hughes v. Glaese (1994), Ind.App., 637 N.E.2d 822. Alleging inconsistencies between this decision and other case law on the question, the plaintiff seeks transfer. Transfer is granted.

The relevant facts were summarized by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Oelling v. RaoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Rohrabaugh Ex Rel. Cross v. WagonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Havens v. RitcheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Adams v. LurosIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Doe v. Shults-Lewis Child & Family Services, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. LeBrun v. ConnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Garneau v. BushIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API