Legal Opinion
Foster v. Oral Surgery Associates, P.A.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 31, 2008PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
[¶ 1] Elizabeth Foster appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Fritzsche, J.) in favor of Oral Surgery Associates, P.A. Foster argues that: (1) the court erred by disqualifying Foster’s expert witness; (2) the court erred by granting Oral Surgery Associates’s motion for judgment as a matter of law; (3) the court’s application of 24 M.R.S. § 2905(1)(A) (2007) is unconstitutional; (4) this Court should establish a more specific standard of care for informed consent for physician-researchers; and (5) section 2905(1)(A) should be interpreted to allow non-medical…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woolley v. HendersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Teel v. ColsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Kapler v. KaplerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Brawn v. Oral Surgery AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Dutil v. BurnsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Picher v. Roman Catholic Bishop of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Patricia Mae Voter v. Dexter R. VoterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Tanya J. McMahon v. Christopher P. McMahonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- Kevin Dube v. Lisa DubeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Estate of Barbara M. FrostSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.