Legal Opinion

Copas v. East Bay Municipal Utility District

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 26, 1999No. C-92-3649 PJHPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HAMILTON, United States Magistrate Judge.

Now before the court is the motion of defendant East Bay Municipal Utility District (“EBMUD” or “the District”) for summary judgment. Having read the parties’ papers, reviewed the evidence submitted, and carefully considered the parties’ arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows.

INTRODUCTION

EBMUD, which is a publicly-owned utility, supplies water and provides wastewa-ter treatment for parts of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. EBMUD serves 20 incorporated cities and 15…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  2. Palacio v. Progressive InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  3. Kohl v. Woodlands Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  4. Heffelfinger v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
  5. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API