Legal Opinion
Adams v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 27, 2005No. 90-162CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
This case is before the court on Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Certain Plaintiffs filed on June 26, 2002, which was raised in opposition to plaintiffs’ April 26, 2002 motion for partial summary judgment, a motion recently decided by this court’s opinion of December 1, 2004, Adams v. United States, No. 90-162C and Consolidated Cases, slip op. at 43-44 (Fed.Cl. Dec. 1, 2004) (Adams III). As stated in Adams III, the court held in abeyance its determination of defendant’s cross-motion.1 Id. at 2. This procedural posture has had the effect of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. YevakporDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2006
- Miller v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- MCLAUGHLIN v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.