Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 25, 2008No. CIV. S-06-2376 LKK/GGHPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
This is a wage and hour action brought by plaintiffs Jason Campbell and Sarah Sobek individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals against defendant PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”). Plaintiffs allege that PwC misclassified them as exempt employees under California law and failed to pay them overtime and other benefits that an employer would normally be required to provide to non-exempt employees. Pending before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for class certification.1 For the reasons explained below, the court…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Vinole v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Wells Fargo Home Mortg. Overtime Pay Lit.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Millan v. Cascade Water Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Keilholtz v. Lennox Hearth Products Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Dilts v. Penske Logistics, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.