Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Melinda R. Alfredson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2017No. 2016AP001400-DPublished

1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

¶ 41. (concurring). I write separately to point out that this decision seems to continue a trend of this court's imposing too light discipline following the parties' entry into a stipulation. See, e.g., In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Krogman, 2015 WI 113, 365 Wis. 2d 628, 872 N.W.2d 657 (Abrahamson, J., dissenting); In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Crandall, 2015 WI 111, 365 Wis. 2d 682, 872 N.W.2d 649 (Abrahamson, J., dissenting).

¶ 42. I am concerned that the stipulation has become a way to engage in plea (including sentencing) negotiations forbidden by this court. The court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel W. Johns, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tim OsickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kenneth R. KratzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tim OsickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API