Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tim Osicka

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2014No. 2013AP000434-DPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the report of the referee, Reserve Judge Robert E. Kinney, recommending that the court suspend the license of Attorney Tim Osicka for 60 days concurrently with any suspension imposed in Case No. 2012AP60-D, and that the court order Attorney Osicka to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which were $1,120.04 as of September 12, 2013.

¶ 2. Because no appeal has been filed from the referee's report and recommendation, we review the matter pursuant to SCR 22.17(2).1 After considering the referee's report and the record in this matter, we agree that Attorney Osicka…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tim OsickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against OsickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EngelbrechtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Alan R. StewartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel W. Johns, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel W. Johns, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kenneth R. KratzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API