Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kenneth R. Kratz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 2014No. 2011AP002758-DPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review the report of the referee, Reserve Judge Robert E. Kinney, recommending the court suspend Attorney Kenneth R. Kratz's license to practice law for a period of four months. No appeal has been filed.
¶ 2. We approve and adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law. We conclude that the seriousness of Attorney Kratz's misconduct warrants a four-month license suspension. We require that Attorney Kratz pay the full costs of the proceeding, which totaled $23,904.10 as of August 20, 2012.
¶ 3. Attorney Kratz has been licensed to practice law in Wisconsin since 1985. He was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Spears v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against PangmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against RidgewayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert J. BaratkiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel P. SteffenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gary KingWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gary KingWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steven D. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.