Legal Opinion

Bahr v. Bahr

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Both complaint and counterclaim alleged that the adverse party had been guilty of cruel and inhuman conduct, specifying particulars. The trial court made findings of fact of which those now material are: Bahr argued with his wife, struck her, and insisted on being the boss. He frequently told her to get out of the house and to get a divorce. He insisted on taking one of his girl friends along when he and Mrs. Bahr went out socially. He called his wife obscene names in the presence of other people. He wrongfully distrusted her and without reason accused her of infidelity.

Findings of fact by a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. GordonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hove v. HoveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Turck v. SeefeldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Elsinger v. ElsingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gauer v. GauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mentzel v. MentzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Jackowick v. JackowickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hitchcock v. HitchcockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Schreiber v. SchreiberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API