Legal Opinion

Turck v. Seefeldt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Findings of fact by the trial court are not to be reversed unless contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. MacPherson v. Strand (1952), 262 Wis. 360, 55 N. W. (2d) 354; Estate of Schaefer (1952), 261 Wis. 431, 437, 53 N. W. (2d) 427. The appellant submits that the findings are not supported by the evidence. The foregoing statement of facts, culled from the record, and the reasonable inference therefrom, which the trial court was privileged to draw, affords the findings the necessary support. We do not imply that if the trial court had found otherwise, as appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hildebrand v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Estate of SchaeferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Foster v. ElswickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. MacPherson v. StrandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Frisch v. ShankwitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Asher v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Zaremba v. KonopkaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Bahr v. BahrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API