Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. Hitchcock

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1977No. 75-298PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Three issues are presented on this appeal:

1. Was the defense of recrimination abolished by the 1971 amendment of sec. 247.101, Stats?

2. If not abolished, may recrimination be raised where it has not been specifically pleaded?

3. If recrimination must be pleaded, did the trial court abuse its discretion by denying the defendant’s motion to amend his answer to plead adulterous conduct on the part of the plaintiff?.Recrimination as a Defense

This court has recognized the doctrine of recrimination in divorce cases. Under this doctrine, if the conduct of both parties has been such as to furnish…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Department of Local Affairs & DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Gauer v. GauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bahr v. BahrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heritage Farms, Inc. v. Markel InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Miller v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  4. State v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API