Gauer v. Gauer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHbffernan, J.
1. Was the finding of the trial court that the acts of the defendant constituted cruel and, inhwmm treatment contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence?
It is settled law that the findings of fact of a trial court on appeal from a divorce judgment must be affirmed unless contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. Merten v. National Manufacturers Bank (1965), 26 Wis. (2d) 181, 186, 131 N. W. (2d) 868. Moreover, great weight is placed upon the discretion of the trial judge. We have stated:
“In divorce cases great and almost controlling weight…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gordon v. GordonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Heffernan v. HeffernanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Rice v. GruetzmacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Mentzel v. MentzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Subrt v. SubrtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Perrenoud v. PerrenoudWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Evjen v. EvjenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Heiting v. HeitingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Jacobs v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.