Legal Opinion
Marchese v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 23, 1991No. 91 Civ. 1300 (CSH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
This case is before the Court on the motion of defendant United States of America under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim; and the motion of defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6).
For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motions are granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Anthony J. Márchese and Rhombus Financial Services Limited (“Rhombus”) filed the instant action against the United States and the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coy U. Spawn, Jr. v. Western Bank--Westheimer, Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Northern Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Far West Federal Bank v. Director Office of Thrift SupervisionDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1992
- Rivera v. HeymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Spawn v. Western Bank WestheimerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993