Legal Opinion
Far West Federal Bank v. Director Office of Thrift Supervision
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 9, 1992No. CV 90-103-PAPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PANNER, District Judge.
The investor plaintiffs seek summary-judgment on Count IY (rescission and restitution) of their first amended and supplemental complaint (now Count I of the second amended and supplemental complaint) on the issue of liability. Defendant, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), seeks summary judgment against Count IV on the issues of liability and damages. Plaintiffs’ motion is granted. Defendant’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
I. The 1987 Conversion Agreement.
Far West is a federally chartered thrift. The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) was created by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Philadelphia Gear Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Winstar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Coy U. Spawn, Jr. v. Western Bank--Westheimer, Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Statesman Savings Holding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Northern Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.