Legal Opinion

Coy U. Spawn, Jr. v. Western Bank--Westheimer, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1993No. 91-6200PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge:

The FDIC, in its corporate capacity as insurer of bank deposits, appeals from the district court’s final judgment, which awarded Coy Spawn prejudgment interest and attorney’s fees in connection with his claim for deposit insurance. As discussed below, we conclude (a) that the FDIC is immune from awards of prejudgment interest in the context of its decisions regarding deposit insurance, and (b) that the district court abused its discretion in determining that the FDIC’s position was not substantially justified for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act. We therefore…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. California Federal Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Maxxam, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Chun v. Board of TrusteesHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Rice v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Davidson v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API