Los Angeles Pacific Co. v. Hubbard
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. John W. Shenk, City Attorney, and Charles D. Houghton, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In proceedings had and taken by the city of Los Angeles for the purpose of opening and widening Sixteenth street, pursuant to the provisions of the street opening act of 19-03, an assessment for the cost of the proposed improvement was levied against the lands and property located within the boundaries of the district as specified in the ordinance of intention. Among other assessments was one levied upon certain property of plaintiff within the district so established, which assessment so made was as follows:
“All ties, tracks, poles, wires, switches, franchises, etc., used in operating an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Appeal of North Beach & Mission RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Stockton Gas & Elec. Co. v. San Joaquin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In re Third, Fourth & Fifth Avenues, SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Southern California Railway Co. v. WorkmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cowart v. Union Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Marion, Bluffton & Eastern Traction Co. v. SimmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Southern Pacific R.R. Co. v. StibbensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Canfield v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Los Angeles Railway Corp. v. Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.