Appeal of North Beach & Mission Railroad
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court, City and County of San Francisco. The facts of this case are stated in the opinion of the Court. Some general facts as to the widening of Kearny street are stated, in the Appeal of Piper, post.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, J.:
Proceedings for widening Kearny street, in the City of San Francisco, were taken by the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, under the Act of 1864. (Laws 1864, p. 347.) By the provisions of this Act the Board *505of Supervisors were authorized to make the improvement, and assess the expenses of the work upon the owners and occupants of houses and lands, railroad corporations and companies that might be benefited thereby; and the authority to determine what portions of the city and county, and what railroad corporations and companies would be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. . the New-York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Wager v. . Troy Union Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- People ex rel. Crowell v. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1862
- Troy & Boston Railroad v. President of the Northern Turnpike Co.New York Supreme Court · 1852
- Heaton v. FerrisNew York Supreme Court · 1806
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Davis v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.