Legal Opinion

Canfield v. Security First National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 3, 1935No. Civ. 8970PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiff was granted a divorce from the defendant Charles 0. Canfield, and a stipulated decree was entered in the action whereby the court awarded to plaintiff, and Canfield agreed to pay to her, among other sums, one-third of the net income received by him from a spendthrift trust created under the will of his father, until the full amount of $20,000 was paid; also the sum of $1,000 monthly for plaintiff’s maintenance and support until Canfield’s death or plaintiff’s remarriage. Said stipulated decree further provided that upon Canfield’s failure to make such payments, a receiver should be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Wetmore v. . WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Cutting v. . CuttingNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Moorehead's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Canfield v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  3. Kelly v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Zimmermann v. Spencer (In Re Spencer)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2004
  5. Coughran v. First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API