Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Railway Corp. v. Flood Control District

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1926No. Docket No. 5561PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover taxes paid under protest to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, a public corporation. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained and this was followed by a judgment in favor of the defendants from which the plaintiff has appealed on the judgment-roll.

The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was a public utility corporation engaged within the boundaries of the Flood Control District in the business of transporting passengers for hire; that the District was created under the “Los Angeles Flood Control Act” (Stats. 1915, p. 1502) ; that,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Southern California Railway Co. v. WorkmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Fox v. WorkmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. Levee District No. 1 of Sutter CountryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. In Re GoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API