Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Arthur Tibbs
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1979No. 78-5191PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendant was convicted of perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623.1 Pursuant to the provisions of that section, a person is guilty of perjury whenever he knowingly makes, under oath, two or more material declarations, one of which is necessarily false, in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States. 18 U.S.C. § 1623(a), (c). In his appeal, defendant does not dispute that the statements alleged in the indictment were material declarations, made by him under oath, one of which was necessarily false. Accordingly, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Richard D. EnrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Bernes B. Stone v. John W. Wingo, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. James L. StassiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. StassiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Delgado-Santos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- United States v. Sun Myung MoonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- People v. SchupperColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- United States v. JaramilloDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- United States v. Joseph Arthur TibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.