Legal Opinion
United States v. Stassi
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 19, 1977No. Crim. 77-00077PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
The defendant, James L. Stassi, was in-dieted by the Grand Jury for making false material declarations under oath in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The indictment charges that on June 2,1975, the defendant, while under oath as a witness before a United States District Court, did knowingly make false material declarations while under questioning by the court at a guilty plea hearing held pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure:
Q. Mr. Stassi, your lawyer says that you want to plead guilty to Count I of this indictment. Is that so?
A. Yes.
Q.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Johnnie Tasby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Melvin A. Slawik, and Bruce A. UffelmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Herman Eugene LardieriCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Burnell G. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- State v. Shilvock-HavirdSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. Robert E. HausmannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- State v. SchoutenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- United States v. Terrance Alan EddyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.