Legal Opinion

United States v. James L. Stassi

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 12, 1978No. 78-1190PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1623 was enacted in 1970 as part of the Organized Crime Control Act to provide that one who under oath “in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court . of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration” is guilty of the offense of false declarations. The statute further provides that an indictment alleging that “the defendant under oath has knowingly made two or more declarations, which are inconsistent to the degree that one of them is necessarily false, need not specify which declaration is false if — (1)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. George S. Krasnov v. Brendan DinanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Michael Joseph Paradiso and Anthony Richard Bonnacci v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Matias Delerme, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Wallace Culbreath v. Alfred t.rundleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Burnell G. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Robert Dennis SwinehartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. MarzglianoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Robert E. HausmannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API