Legal Opinion

United States v. Jaramillo

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 13, 1994No. CR 93-0418 BACPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW

CAULFIELD, District Judge.

Defendant Guillermo Jaramillo is charged with making false statements in' a witness statement which he signed under penalty of perjury in lieu of grand jury testimony, and in his testimony in open court after being placed under oath. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1623 prohibits false declarations by anyone under oath or in any declaration as permitted under 28 U.S.C. § 1746 “in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States.” The court conducted a court trial on the factual and legal issues on November…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. KroghDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  3. United States v. Joseph Arthur TibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. JaramilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8505, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,675 United States of America v. Guillermo JaramilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API