Legal Opinion
Yankelewitch v. Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 24, 1931No. Docket No. 4291PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
Respondents brought this action to recover from defendant $1323.50 upon written guaranty of appellant to pay same. Judgment went for respondents, from which appellant has appealed.
It appears from the evidence that respondents were co-partners doing business under the name of the Star Plumbing & Hardware Company, and on July 7, 1926, they entered into a contract with L. C. Adams to do the plumbing work and furnish plumbing material for the construction of an apartment building. The contract price was fixed at $15,400, to be paid for as the work progressed, and said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bacon v. GrosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Ackley v. PrimeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Flynn v. SealeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Meyer v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roberts v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Mirabile v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Rubin v. TobermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Carnation Co. v. Olivet Egg RanchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- West v. AnkneyPaulding County Court of Common Pleas · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.