Legal Opinion

DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1957No. Civ. No. 21909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Parker), J.

Appeal by defendant Ideal Heating Corporation from an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. The action is to recover damages which resulted from a fire that destroyed part of a building and personal property. The fire was caused by the alleged negligence of defendant Lupella, an employee of defendant Ideal. In a jury trial, judgment was for defendant Ideal. (Lupella did not appear in the action—apparently he was not served with summons and complaint.) The motion for a new trial was granted on the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence, and errors of law.

There…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LagissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Butler v. Progressive Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API