DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Plaintiffs instituted an action to recover damages resulting from a fire alleged to have been caused by defendant corporation, acting through its agent, defendant Lupella, in negligently causing a fire which damaged property of plaintiffs. A cross-complaint was filed and after trial before the court without a jury, the trial court found:(a) “That it is true that on the 12th day of April, 1946, defendant Lupella was employed by defendant Ideal, and that while on the premises of said defendant Ideal at 807 E. Gage Avenue in the course of his employment, said Lupella negligently and carelessly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- National Park Bank v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Johndrow v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Feeney v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Yore v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Saala v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- McIvor v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954