Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 2019No. S066812PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

597 On petition to review ballot title filed June 20, considered and under advisement on August 6; ballot title referred to Attorney General for modification October 10, 2019 Julie PARRISH, Petitioner, v. Ellen F. ROSENBLUM, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent. (SC S066812)

450 P3d 973

The Attorney General certified a ballot title for Initiative Petition 13 (2020) (IP 13). Petitioner challenged the certified ballot title on the grounds that its cap- tion, “yes” and “no” vote result statements, and summary did not substantially comply with the requirements of ORS 250.035. Held: The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kain/Waller v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Greene v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Rasmussen v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Whitsett v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Wolf v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hurst/Van Dusen v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Buel/Markley v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Mason/Turrill v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Hopkins/Starrett v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API