Legal Opinion

Regents of the University of Michigan v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1896PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Mandamus by the Regents of the University of Michigan against Stanley W. Turner, Auditor General, to compel the payment of interest on the “university fund” at the rate of 7 per cent.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Certain lands granted by the Federal Government to the State as an endowment to the State University having been sold by the State, the fund resulting therefrom constitutes the university fund. A similar provision exists for primary schools, while State land grants for the endowment of the State Normal School and the Agricultural College have resulted in funds for the support of these institutions. It is the custom of the State to pay interest upon such funds annually, the same having been paid from specific taxes. See Const, art. 14, § 1. Act No. 114, Laws 1845, provided for the payment of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Knapp v. . the City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Allen, Ball & Co. v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  5. United States v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Pleasant Ridge v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Edwards v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Yarger v. City of HastingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. MalschMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hopkins v. SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API