Legal Opinion
People v. Malsch
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1898PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Exceptions before judgment from Berrien; Coolidge, J. Albert Malsch was convicted of refusing and neglecting to support his family.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The defendant was convicted upon a complaint and warrant charging that—
*113“Albert Malsch, of said township of Lake, has been, and is, a disorderly person, within the meaning of section 1 of Act No. 264 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1889, being section 1997a of 3 Howell’s Annotated Statutes of the State of Michigan, and amendments thereto, for that the said Albert Malsch, at the township of Lake, in said county, during and at the times aforesaid, he, the said Albert Malsch, being then and there a married man, with a wife and child then and there lawfully dependent upon him, the said Albert…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Darmstaetter v. MoloneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Pleasant Ridge v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. StickleMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. WallerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Kistler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. LangfordOregon Supreme Court · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.