Legal Opinion

Yarger v. City of Hastings

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1965No. Calendar 70, Docket 50,782PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

On April 29, 1961, plaintiff was injured by falling into a hole more than 2 inches deep in one of defendant city’s public sidewalks. On May 12,1961, plaintiff, by her attorneys, filed a claim with defendant city for resulting injuries. On May 22, 1961, the city clerk presented the claim to the city council, which referred it to its insurance committee. On November 2,1961, defendant’s insurance carrier acknowledged, by letter to plaintiff’s attorneys, receipt of the latter’s May 12th letter or claim sent to the city and wrote that when said attorneys should indicate that their file was ready…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Bement v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Attorney General, Ex Rel. Owen v. JoyceMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Hughes v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Forest v. ParmaleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Huhtala v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Old Orchard by the Bay Associates v. Hamilton Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API