Legal Opinion

Mahdesian v. Wausau Insurance

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 13, 1990No. 2:90-cv-70632PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZATKOFF, District Judge.

This matter is currently before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Both parties have responded and the motions are now ripe for review.

FACTS

Plaintiff brought this suit to obtain no-fault benefits pursuant to the Michigan No-Fault Insurance Act for an injury which occurred on June 1, 1989. Plaintiffs injury occurred while plaintiff was employed as a truck driver for Hankin Transportation Inc.

Plaintiff made an initial stop, as required by the Michigan Department of Transportation, in order to inspect his tractor trailer and his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lee v. National Union Fire InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Mahdesian v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API