Legal Opinion
Mahdesian v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 29, 1992No. 90-CV-73160-DTPublished
1Opinion of the Court
*64MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Prior to filing the instant litigation, plaintiff Norman Mahdesian sued defendant Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., in an attempt to obtain no-fault benefits pursuant to the Michigan Motor Vehicle Personal and Property Protection Act, M.C.L. §§ 500.3101-.3179. Plaintiff maintained that he was defendant’s employee throughout that action and, ultimately, recovered judgment against…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.